The best website for free high-quality Unilever DIN Offc Pro fonts, with 22 free Unilever DIN Offc Pro fonts for immediate download, and 27 professional Unilever DIN Offc Pro fonts for the best price on the Web. If you recognize the font from the samples posted here don't be shy and help a fellow designer. Thousands of designers (famous or not) use the image font detection system to find a font or similar free fonts from an image. Although we have the largest database of fonts, the search for a font from an image gets mixed results like the image above.
![]() ![]()
This font has been my daily driver for at least a year.It has some similarities with Pragmata Pro (my previous font), but has evolved to have its own personality now.I build a custom version of the font with this command-line:$ make custom-config design='v-tilde-low v-asterisk-low v-underscore-low v-at-short v-zero-dotted term' && make customThis gives me:- Disabled ligatures (I don't like them for my coding font)- Underscore below the baseline (it is called underscore, after all)- Tilde and asterisk centered vertically- Zero with dots through it- Fira Sans style @ symbol.Sample. Not the commenter you're asking to, but ligatures, to me, are a print thing. They are not nice on the computer screen. I'm kind-of fine with fi and ffi with variable-width fonts, but the rest is geekery (which is fine in itself, but not practical).With print, you have to think about kerning and the flow of the ink, and the DPI of the printer, and many other variables, and some ligatures help with that (fi). Then there are some letter strings that appear consequently very often (e.g.
St), in which case if you're cutting your fonts out of metal cubes, it's practical to have a single character for those strings. They are not, basically, of help to the reader, but instead to the typesetter / the machine. But you don't spend ink or metal on a computer screen, so the ligatures are just there for the sake of it.With monospace fonts, well, because there's no kerning (each character takes up equal space), there's no way that normally any bits of the letters could coincide, so all the ligatures are forced and artificial there. I like trying new fonts for coding. So far I went back to my favorite DejaVu Sans Mono as I can legibly use it for coding at size 8. On my screen I can see 65 lines of code.
When I tried Iosevka it does look good, but at size 8 it's legibility is not as good as DejaVu, it is about 20% more narrow (which is not too important to me), but it can fit just 60 lines of code on my screen. Less code and less legibility than DejaVu, so I'll pass. But I do love that there is a selection of high quality fonts for coding nowadays. I am wary of licenses which attempt to narrowly define things like personal use with language that is incredibly legally vague. For the purposes of this License, Personal Use is defined as any use on your own computer that involves computer programming, software development, or the composition of plaintext documents in personal, professional, or non-professional contexts.namely: composition of plaintext documentsjust composition? What if I print it? Can I use it in a presentation?
I would rather not agree to language which seems to imply a future requirement to purchase some 'other' licence if I trigger any of those clauses. That matches up with my initial impression as well. I'm coming from Fira Code, which I've been using for a while now and really love. The glyphs are noticeably wider, but to be honest, after using Iosevka for the last half hour or so, I'm kind of enjoying the compactness.It's the first narrow typeface I haven't rejected immediately for writing code. I ran into what looks like some issues with certain ligatures not being substituted, but that looks to be an editor-specific issue. They're fine in Terminal and vim, but Atom had some issues with some (e.g., and others along those lines).
I will say that Fira Code seems to have a more diverse set of ligatures,0 though some of them-the equality glyphs in particular-were annoying at times because they were such a visible change over what you actually typed.0. I will most likely create my own at some point. In the previous discussion there were some interesting suggestions for improvements.eg.In terms of creating a space-saving reading system, I think a better place to start would be with the writing system itself. Dotsies squishes letters but does not remove them.I propose a system where each word is reduced to its minimal representation, eg. Where letters are removed until the smallest unique form is found (giving more common words shorter forms).Once I have such a mapping developed (for both reading and accelerated writing) I will see if something like dotsies still makes sense.In any case I will not use squares: they make my eyes sad. Maybe circles:). Thank you for posting this!I purchased the Essential version of PragmataPro™1 because I love a narrower monospaced font for terminal windows and editors.
Allowing for a better use of horizontal screen real estate.Having something that is this configurable—including the leading—is fantastic! I will definitely give it a try.One thing that may make me stick with PragmataPro is the fact that Fabrizio has hand-optimized the screen display for over 7000 characters from 9pt to 48pt to guarantee the best possible readability. No weird rendering artifacts. It's amazing, but unfortunately many people are 'put off' on the idea of paying for that kind of attention to detail.In any case, thanks for offering this free variant of a customizable, narrow terminal font!P.S.
Does it have the Powerline2 characters?12.
![]() Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |